What to ask your doctor for
Written to be printed and handed over. It sets out which tests the published MCAS criteria are built on, when they have to be drawn, and which drug classes those criteria refer to.
Two things it is not. It is not a request list — a clinician has reasons for ordering or declining any of these, and several of the disagreements below are live in the literature rather than settled. And it is not a treatment plan: the drug classes appear here because responding to them is part of the diagnostic criteria, not because this site is recommending them. There is no dosing anywhere on it.
For the other half of an appointment — the specific entries you want to raise, with their evidence and citations — build a printable appointment sheet. This page covers what to test for; that one covers what you want to discuss.
Mast cell activation syndrome — diagnostic tests and criteria
Prepared from published diagnostic criteria by a patient. Sources listed at the end. No dosing, and no treatment recommendation.
The three criteria, and the two versions of them
A diagnosis requires all three of:
- Clinical — recurrent symptoms of mast cell activation involving two or more organ systems at once.
- Laboratory — a substantial, transient rise in a validated mast cell mediator during the episode, measured against the patient's own baseline.
- Response — symptoms come under control with drugs that target mast cells or their mediators.
Two criteria sets are in use and they are not interchangeable. Consensus-1, the stricter one, is what most allergy and immunology practice in the US works to; it requires the tryptase rise below. Consensus-2 is broader and accepts a wider range of markers, so more patients qualify.
The disagreement is about which error is worse. The consensus-2 authors argue that underdiagnosis under the strict criteria is the larger problem; the stricter camp argues that loose criteria sweep in patients whose symptoms have other causes. The consensus-2 paper itself concludes that, pending better research, diagnosis by either proposal is reasonable — which is a fairer summary than either side's advocates usually give.
The core panel
These are the tests both criteria sets are built on. If only one thing gets ordered, it is the tryptase pair.
-
Serum tryptase — baseline Blood
Also called sBT, Resting tryptase
- Shows
- The resting tryptase level this patient runs at, which the episode sample is measured against. A level below 8 ng/mL is generally considered normal.
- When
- Drawn at least 24 hours after complete recovery from a suspected episode. A sample taken too soon is not a baseline.
- Worth knowing
- A normal baseline does not rule MCAS out, and a raised baseline on its own is not a criterion for it. Raised baseline tryptase also occurs in hereditary alpha-tryptasemia, systemic mastocytosis, some blood disorders, end-stage kidney disease, and parasitic infection.
-
Serum tryptase — during an episode Blood
Also called Acute tryptase, Event-related tryptase
- Shows
- Whether tryptase actually rose during the episode. Both criteria sets look for a rise above the patient's own baseline multiplied by 1.2, plus 2 ng/mL.
- When
- This is the part most often got wrong. Tryptase peaks in serum about an hour after symptoms start, then falls with a half-life of roughly two hours — so it may still be raised at three hours, sometimes at five, and not much beyond. A sample drawn the next day, or at a routine appointment weeks later, cannot meet this criterion no matter how severe the episode was.
- Worth knowing
- Because the window is short, the practical problem is access: someone has to be able to order it while the episode is happening or shortly after. This is worth planning before an episode rather than during one.
-
Urinary leukotriene E4 Urine
Also called LTE4
- Shows
- A cysteinyl leukotriene metabolite. Leukotrienes are made by mast cells on activation rather than stored ready-made, so they report a different part of the response than tryptase does.
- When
- Collected during the onset of an episode and for several hours after.
- Worth knowing
- Like the prostaglandin metabolite, the assay is available in relatively few laboratories.
-
Urinary 1-methyl-4-imidazole acetic acid Urine
Also called MIAA
- Shows
- The other commonly measured histamine metabolite, used alongside or instead of N-methylhistamine.
- When
- As for N-methylhistamine — collected across the episode and the hours following.
- Worth knowing
- Less specific to mast cells than tryptase.
-
Urinary N-methylhistamine Urine
Also called N-methyl histamine
- Shows
- A histamine breakdown product. Reported to track both mast cell burden and mast cell activation.
- When
- A 24-hour collection is the usual advice, though shorter collections and spot samples are also discussed. Most informative when the collection covers the episode and the hours after it.
- Worth knowing
- Less specific to mast cells than tryptase.
-
Urinary prostaglandin D2 metabolite Urine
Also called 9α,11β-PGF2, PGD2 metabolite
- Shows
- A breakdown product of prostaglandin D2, which mast cells make on activation. Found raised during anaphylaxis and in systemic mastocytosis compared with healthy controls.
- When
- Collected during the onset of an episode and for several hours after.
- Worth knowing
- The assay is technically difficult and offered by only a few laboratories, so it may need to be sent out. Rises over an individual's own baseline have not been reported in most studies, which limits how it can be interpreted.
Tests that change the answer
Not markers of activation, but tests that explain a result or point somewhere else entirely. Both are ordinary send-outs.
-
KIT D816V testing Blood or bone marrow
Also called KIT mutation analysis, Clonality testing
- Shows
- The mutation that drives clonal mast cell disease. Its presence points towards mastocytosis or monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome rather than non-clonal MCAS.
- When
- Any time. Blood assays are screening tests; bone marrow examination is the definitive one and is a specialist referral.
- Worth knowing
- This distinguishes between conditions with different treatments, so it changes what follows rather than merely confirming a label. Sensitive blood assays exist but a negative result does not exclude clonal disease.
-
TPSAB1 copy number Blood
Also called Hereditary alpha-tryptasemia genotyping, HαT testing
- Shows
- Extra germline copies of the alpha-tryptase gene. This causes hereditary alpha-tryptasemia, in which baseline tryptase is raised for genetic reasons and rises further with each additional gene copy.
- When
- Any time; it is a genetic test, not an episode-dependent one.
- Worth knowing
- Worth knowing about because it is a common benign explanation for a raised baseline tryptase. Without it, a high resting tryptase can be read as evidence of mast cell disease when it is inherited and unrelated.
Ordered under the broader criteria
Where the two criteria sets visibly disagree. Worth knowing which side of that disagreement a given clinician is on.
-
Heparin, chromogranin A, platelet-activating factor and serotonin Blood or urine
Also called Extended mediator panel
- Shows
- Additional mediators sometimes ordered when working to the broader criteria, on the reasoning that tryptase misses patients whose activation shows up in other mediators.
- When
- Varies by marker and laboratory.
- Worth knowing
- This is where the two criteria sets visibly diverge. Clinicians working to the stricter criteria regard the clinical utility of these markers as unproven on current data. That is a real disagreement in the literature rather than an oversight, and a clinician declining to order them is not necessarily dismissing the question.
Commonly asked for, but not recommended
Included because patients often arrive asking for it, and a clinician declining is following the literature rather than dismissing the question.
-
Plasma histamine Blood
Also called Blood histamine
- Shows
- Circulating histamine.
- When
- —
- Worth knowing
- Not generally recommended as a marker of mast cell activation. At baseline much of it comes from basophils rather than mast cells, and the result is affected by how the sample is drawn and stored, by diet, and by bacterial flora of the urinary tract. Frequently requested and hard to interpret.
The drug classes the criteria refer to
The third criterion is a response to drugs that stabilise mast cells or block their mediators, and the literature describes a stepwise approach through those classes. They are listed here because the criteria refer to them — not as a recommendation. Each links to its entry on this site, where its mast-cell relationship, cited study types, named evidence conditions and limits are stated separately.
Worth noticing while reading: the first, second and fourth of these do not act on mast cells at all. They block a mediator after release.
-
Step 1 · H1 antihistamines
described as the initial treatment, with second-generation agents prioritised over first
-
Step 2 · H2 antihistamines
described as add-on therapy where episodes involve gastrointestinal symptoms
-
Step 3 · Leukotriene receptor antagonists
the next class described; in Canada montelukast is the only available option
-
Step 4 · Cromolyn
described for persistent gastrointestinal symptoms despite H1 and H2 blockade
-
Step 5 · Ketotifen
described for patients not controlled on high-dose second-generation H1 antihistamines
-
Step 6 · Aspirin
described as limited evidence, for persistent episodes despite H1 blockade
-
Step 7 · Oral corticosteroids
described for frequent episodes, with use limited by adverse effects
-
Step 8 · Omalizumab
described for severe recurrent reactions despite the preceding treatments
The criteria also name aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among the mediator-targeting agents. This site does not yet have an entry for them, so they are noted here rather than linked.
Finding a clinician
This site does not list individual doctors. There is no board certification in MCAS, so any such list would rest on someone's judgement rather than a credential — and a page that reads as a referral is a different kind of thing from a page that cites its sources.
What it can do is point at the organisations that maintain referral routes, and say what is worth establishing early.
-
European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM)
Network of European reference centres for mast cell disease. Useful for locating specialist centres and for following the research consortium's output.
-
Mast Cell Action
UK charity focused on MCAS specifically. Publishes patient-facing resources and materials intended to be taken to appointments.
-
Mastocytosis Society Canada
Canadian patient organization for mast cell disease, with region-specific care and emergency information.
-
The Mast Cell Disease Society (TMS)
US non-profit for mastocytosis and mast cell activation disorders. Maintains physician referral lists, emergency-protocol documents, and patient education material.
Worth establishing early
- Which criteria they apply. The single most useful thing to know. Consensus-1 and consensus-2 admit meaningfully different patient populations, so two clinicians can disagree about a diagnosis while reading the same results correctly. Asking is not a challenge; it tells you how the rest of the conversation will go.
- Whether they can order a tryptase during an episode. The test is only interpretable inside a narrow window, so the practical question is access rather than willingness — who can order it, and how, when an episode is actually happening. Worth arranging before one.
- Who investigates the alternatives. Several more common conditions present similarly, and ruling them out is part of the diagnosis rather than a detour around it.
A clinician who declines a test on the list above is not necessarily dismissing the question — several of those disagreements are live in the literature, and this page says which.
Sources
Everything above is drawn from these. Where they disagree, the page says so rather than picking a side.
- Using the Right Criteria for MCAS Review article 2024 PMID 38243020 · link checked 22 Aug 2026
- Diagnosis of mast cell activation syndrome: a global "consensus-2" Review article 2021 PMID 32324159 · link checked 22 Aug 2026
- Diagnosis, Classification and Management of Mast Cell Activation Syndromes (MCAS) in the Era of Personalized Medicine Review article 2020 PMID 33261124 · link checked 22 Aug 2026